X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation
0.0
  • Appearance design:0.0
  • Comfortable cushioning:0.0
  • Stability protection:0.0
  • Sole performance:0.0
  • cost performance:0.0

 With people’s attention to their body shape and health

Running is an ancient and simple way to keep fit

Gradually recognized by more and more people

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation1

Zero foundation, not limited by the venue and time, as long as you have a simple equipment, you can start running at any time to experience the climax feeling of a lonely gourmet when eating, and you can also install it in the ticket circle with the help of all kinds of ah Po. Who doesn’t like this sport?

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation2

Watching many friends from non professional athletes around in the ticket circle run, their state changes from greasy to fresh, their appearance grows inversely, and their running volume also ranges from 3 kilometers of the basic to 10 kilometers of the mark runner, and even challenges half a horse and the whole horse, but they also listen to all kinds of negative news of sudden death and sports injury,The knowledge of “scientific training and reasonable fitness” has been widely recognized.

Then a pair of running shoes with integrated technology and suitable feet has become the most important choice for people in the running circle for their own sports equipment.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation3

As the 35th generation product of this series, Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 has attracted the attention of many runners as soon as it was launched this summer with its good reputation, the application of running shoe technology and accurate product positioning.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation4

Let’s talk about the appearance first. I believe some friends have seen some publicity manuscripts and have a certain understanding of the appearance of this pair of shoes. I happen to have a pair of friends’ pegasus33 at hand. I’ll compare my feelings.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation5

The biggest feature of this pair of shoes compared with the previous two generations isAt the heel, extend the length of the collar at the Achilles tendon and streamline the inclined heel outsoleTo make the shoes look more slender. This design change makes the shoes look better from the side, rear or bottom.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation6
X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation7

The number of lace holes is reduced from 5 to 4, increasing the flexibility of the toe.In addition, the design of 34 generations of hidden flying lines is extended to further improve the integrity of the appearance of the shoes. The overall mesh upper feels softer than the 33rd generation.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation8

Still did not use the more popular nowIntegrated tongue, this is also the consistent design of most professional running shoes. Compared with the 33rd generation, the shoelaces are more flat and harder.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation9

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation10

In terms of technology,The midsole is still Zoom Air and cushion foamThe biggest change is that the front and back split air cushions are adjusted to one-piece full-length air cushions, and the unique shape of carbon plate in Nike Zoom vapor 4% running shoes is imitated.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation11
X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation12

Next, I will describe the shape and configuration, and the wearing experience brought by Pegasus 35.

Evaluation environment: I am 180cm, weighing 80kg, running on the ground with the forefoot, slightly everted, with an average step frequency of 170. Within 2 hours of half horse performance, the vertical stride ratio is slightly higher than about 10%. Therefore, I prefer some stable running shoes with good forefoot cushioning. In terms of brands, I like to try some emerging brands in the running shoe circle. The running shoes I wear include ASICs K21, Adidas UB, hokaone Bondi 4, etc. Now I will introduce it in three stages: initial experience, treadmill 5km run and outdoor 14km run.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation13

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation14

The first experience is mainly the feeling of stepping on the foot after getting the shoes.

The first feeling of Pegasus 35 is that the package is tight, mainly concentrated in the middle of the foot surface close to the ankle, and the forefoot and toes are loose and flexible`

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation15

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation16

Stepping on the ground, the rear foot cushioning is obviously very soft, the forefoot can feel a certain air cushion, and the arch support is very obvious. It seems that the role of a whole air cushion is still obvious. The upper has certain support, but it is generally soft, without any discomfort of blocking the foot.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation17
X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation18
X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation19

  5km running on treadmill:

The reason for choosing this length is that it covers the warm-up distance before fitness and the common 30 minute aerobic fat burning distance after strength training.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation20

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation21
X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation22
X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation23

The biggest feeling for me at this stage is lightness. With the extension of running time, I got a satisfactory answer to the tight package and arch support I worried about at the beginning of my experience. During running, the shoes have little constraints on the feet. Some feel more relaxed as I run, and I can hardly feel the weight of the shoes. This is quite satisfactory. Forefoot running can obviously feel the support of the back of the running shoe and the arch of the foot after touching the ground.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation24

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation25

In addition, the air permeability is good, without any muggy feeling. Because it is running on the treadmill, the cushioning performance is not mentioned here. The disadvantage is that the forefoot wrap is too loose and the toe part shakes in the shoe.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation26

  Outdoor 14km running:

As a runner who finished the race half a horse, I chose this distance to evaluate the running shoes, just to test whether it can support me to participate in the race. At this stage, I adjusted my pace properly and tried a back foot run to experience the performance of my running shoes.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation27

Let’s talk about the advantages first,The first must be the upper, outdoor running is different from only linear movement on the treadmill. It requires some turning and unnecessary deceleration. However, in the whole process of running, the wrapping and support of the upper are in place. There is no discomfort or foot rubbing caused by insufficient support and too tight wrapping. I am very satisfied.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation28

The second is shoelacesYes, the shoelace is an insignificant detail. The flat and hard shoelace makes me feel that the shoelace is not loose during several training sessions with this running shoe, and the whole process of sports is confined to positioning. Although this is insignificant, runners are very clear about their feelings. No one wants to stop from time to time to fasten the loose shoelace during running, I don’t want to cause unnecessary sports injury because of loose shoelaces.

The third is lightweight and linkage, the overall wearing feeling of the running shoes is very light, which will not cause too much burden to the runner, and the linkage brought by the overall air cushion is very good. After the forefoot is grounded, the overall touchdown response from the arch to the heel can be obviously felt.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation29

Besides, where I don’t think it’s right for me,First, cushioningAwesome vibration of this running shoe is a bit similar to my ASICS K21. In the front 10KM, I felt the front pallet slow vibration, with the lengthening of running distance, repeated mechanical movement, and it was all gone after ten kilometers. But it is worth mentioning that after I adjusted the back palm running method, the rear palm’s slow vibration was still strong in 14KM.

Second, rebound, the most obvious impression I have made in this aspect of shoes is UB. The feeling within 10km is excellent, which constantly gives runners the confidence to finish the race. Pegasus35 is on a par with other shoes, with average rebound, but fortunately, there is no need to worry about stability.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation30

Finally, to sum up, pegasus35 shoes are generally reassuring. Although they are not particularly amazing, they are competent as training shoes for daily 10km running,At the same time, as a semi horse racing shoe, it is also more reliable and will not worry about the stability of shoelaces, blisters and fatigue.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation31

In particular, the overall design of shoes is also widely matched, which can be worn for leisure and competition training. In terms of size selection, running shoes are generally one size larger. It is recommended that runners with high arch or wide foot try them on.

X-lab | road running microwave oven – Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 35 evaluation32

In a word, Pegasus 35 is a

Suitable for forefoot speed or hindfoot running

Good daily training and dressing

At the same time, you can run on your feet

Cost effective shoes without any running in

I hope my evaluation of this shoe

Will help you choose running shoes