#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison
0.0
  • Appearance design:0.0
  • Comfortable cushioning:0.0
  • Stability protection:0.0
  • Sole performance:0.0
  • cost performance:0.0

 

#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison1

The battle between the Cavaliers and warriors in the finals has ended. This season’s NBA finally ended with warriors. You may still be silent in the aftertaste of Durant’s unreasonable scoring, LeBron’s comprehensive performance, curry’s super long three-point range, Owen’s coquettish performance, Thompson’s steady running, Green’s professional wrestling performance… But at the shoe level, Crazy explosive 2017 PK, Adidas’s main practical basketball shoe this summer, has made a strong attack on the network media outside the magnesium lamp with the brilliant reputation created by the previous work.

Next, we will bring you a static evaluation of this basketball shoe by comparing it with crazy explosive PK 2016.
#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison2
#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison3
Let’s talk about the overall design first: maybe the CE shape in 2016 is too non mainstream for traditional basketball shoes. This 2017 does not give people an alternative shape impact, but tends to be more modern. The design of 2016 inner boots is changed to the one-piece Garter design without a single tongue, which is very streamlined and smooth. When viewed from above, the visual effects of the two shoe types are basically the same, reflecting the consistent sense of forefoot fertility of full-length boost shoes.
#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison4
#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison5
#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison6
Although PK technology is adopted for the upper part of both models, the weaving methods are relatively different. The weaving in 2017 is more compact. Different styles are used to distinguish the upper, tongue and upper parts of the integrated shoe. Three dimensional stripes are added on the upper, which is significantly less flexible than the 2016 version. It should be an adjustment to correct the criticized upper support in 2016.
#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison7
#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison8
Although the uppers of both shoes are wrapped with thin woven uppers, and the actual height is not high, the wrapping methods are different. In 2016, the laces are tightened by external force, while in 2017, they are tightened by the material of their own uppers.
#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison9
We can see from the heel that the height of the two shoes at the Achilles tendon is basically the same. The difference is that 2016 is the actual inner boot height, while 2017 is only the sock height, and the thicker part should be only half the height of 2016. The material is also relatively soft in 2016, and the sock in 2017 is relatively stiff. In the design, an ingenious design is the shoe lift, which not only increases the sense of design hierarchy, but also has certain practical value. One adds a brand logo.
On the shoelace system, there are 5 pairs of shoelace holes in 2017, one more pair than the previous one, and asymmetric design is used, but the height of the last pair of shoelace holes is lower than that in 2016. The shoelaces are also changed from the rod-shaped shoelaces made before to flat shoelaces.
#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison10
The shoe body logo2017 adopts the skin sticking method, which is more three-dimensional and high-end.
#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison11
#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison12
Both midsole models adopt the same full-length boost technology and eye patch TPU support patch. The difference is that the 2017 model has been further upgraded by adding a small TPU in the forefoot, which is connected to the vertical outside of the forefoot by the horizontal sole.
#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison13
#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison14
#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison15
2017’s outsole follows the pattern design full of gimmicks made in the front, but it is wrapped on the midsole boost at the back, with higher height and smaller openings.
#X-lab # generation net yellow – Crazy explosive static comparison16
It can be said that crazy explosive 2016 was an excellent actual combat basketball shoe last year. Since the actual combat evaluation, the author has chosen the first shoe in each game. It can be seen from this article that the new 2017 has brought many design differences, such as the integrated shoe body, the reduced flexibility of the upper, the design of the upper sock sleeve, the reduction of the hole position of the shoelace, the addition of the vertical TPU of the midsole forefoot, etc. these small elements will bring changes in the wearing feeling compared with the previous work. We will make an objective comparison and evaluation in the near future. Please look forward to it.